Bug 1984464
Summary: | Inconsistency in Limits Documentation regards maximum supported memory | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Steffen Froemer <sfroemer> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Eli Marcus <emarcus> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | rhev-docs <rhev-docs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.4.6 | CC: | ctomasko, emarcus, lsurette, mhicks, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.4.10 | Keywords: | Documentation, NoDocsQEReview |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-09 14:11:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Docs | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steffen Froemer
2021-07-21 13:59:18 UTC
Moving out to 4.4.10 as 4.4.9 shipped live Steffen, I discovered that Jiri Hermann had already updated the RHV limits article last August, but left it in Draft status. I spoke with Jiri, and he agreed that we can now publish those updates - please check if this meets your approval - https://access.redhat.com/articles/906543 and then we can mark this bug as "closed - current release" Hi Eli, the VM limits are fine now. The host maximums are not. > Question: How to host a VM with 16TB on a host with 12TB to comply with support policy. I would propose it to align with RHEL limits [1] as we have RHEL underneath. So for RHEL7 based Hosts 12TB tested and for RHEL8 based ones, 24TB tested. Would that make sense? Cheers, Steffen [1]: https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits |