Bug 198816

Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Feist <cfeist>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Ruben Kerkhof <ruben>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: j
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-04 21:15:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Chris Feist 2006-07-13 20:20:40 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.0-0.fc6.0.src.rpm
Description: This package provides the userland utilities for GFS (Global File System) version 1.  mkfs, fsck, etc.

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2006-07-14 08:16:02 UTC
You spec contains this:

if ["$1" = 0 ]; then

This is invalid /bin/sh syntax. There must be a blank after the '['.


Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-07-15 06:53:46 UTC
Mock build failed for rawhide i386
main.c:29:26: error: libvolume_id.h: No such file or directory

You Need to add libvolume_id-devel in BuildRequires



Comment 4 Chris Feist 2006-07-17 19:12:22 UTC
Fixed that as well. (libvolume_id.h BuildRequire)

New files are here:
http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils.spec
http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.0-0.fc6.2.src.rpm

Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-21 02:47:58 UTC
Chris, I don't see you in the cvsextras group.  Do you require sponsorship?  See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored for more information.

Comment 6 Chris Feist 2006-09-29 20:14:02 UTC
Jason,

Yes I do need sponsorship for this package.  Can you sponsor me?

Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2006-09-29 22:01:23 UTC
I can, but would need to look over this and your other submissions first.  I
hope to have some time to spend on extras reviews over the next couple of days.

Comment 8 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-01-22 23:11:47 UTC
Hi Chris,

Since you've been sponsored by jkatz, I'll remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker.

I've found a few things though:

rpmlint of gfs-utils is not silent:
W: gfs-utils incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.fc6.0 0.1.0-0.fc6.2
W: gfs-utils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gfs
E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Description
E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Short-Description
W: gfs-utils incoherent-init-script-name gfs

The package should contain the text of the license
  (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)

Scriptlets: missing "service" in %preun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
Scriptlets: missing "service" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)

* Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)
* No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag.

Please don't hardcode the distro in Release, use %dist

Comment 9 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-02-03 21:29:39 UTC
Ping?

Comment 10 Chris Feist 2007-02-21 21:51:35 UTC
I've updated the package.  I don't know what 'missing-mandatory-lsb-tag' means
and can't find any documentation on how to fix those errors.  All other errors
should be fixed.  There is no central location for the gfs-utils-0.1.11.tar.gz
script, it's pulled directly out of cvs which is found at
sources.redhat.com/cluster/

http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-utils-0.1.11-3.src.rpm

Let me know what else I need for this rpm.


Comment 11 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-02-21 23:19:02 UTC
Thanks Chris,

> E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Description
> E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Short-Description

Those errors are about the init file
rpmlint checks that file for tags between

### BEGIN INIT INFO

and 

### END INIT INFO

The checks are defined in /usr/share/rpmlint/InitScriptCheck.py

A few new rpmlint warnings have popped up:

[ruben@odin i386]$ rpmlint gfs-utils-0.1.11-3.i386.rpm 
W: gfs-utils dangling-relative-symlink /sbin/mount.gfs mount.gfs2
W: gfs-utils dangling-relative-symlink /sbin/umount.gfs umount.gfs2

[ruben@odin i386]$ rpmlint gfs-utils-debuginfo-0.1.11-3.i386.rpm 
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/log.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/fs_dir.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/util.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/inode.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/fs_bits.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/rgrp.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/file.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/fs_bmap.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/bitmap.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/fs_inode.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/block_list.c
W: gfs-utils-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gfs-0.1.11/libgfs/bio.c

Comment 12 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-03-23 08:07:05 UTC
Hi Chris,

Please respond, or I'll have to close this ticket in a week.

Comment 13 Ruben Kerkhof 2007-04-04 21:15:31 UTC
Sorry, I'll have to close this review.