Bug 1988507
| Summary: | VDSM cannot update due to missing openvswitch versions on ppc64le architecture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Vinícius Ferrão <vinicius> |
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Martin Tessun <mtessun> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Lukas Svaty <lsvaty> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.4.7 | CC: | amusil, bugs, daturece, liliu, lsurette, mburman, mhicks, michal.skrivanek, mperina, mtessun, sbonazzo, soliu, srevivo, the |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-02-17 10:13:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Rel-Eng | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Vinícius Ferrão
2021-07-30 17:09:30 UTC
The documentation text flag should only be set after 'doc text' field is provided. Please provide the documentation text and set the flag to '?' again. Hi, it seems like you are completely missing FDP repository on this host. Sandro, can someone from your team please take look? Thanks, Ales Hi Ales, in fact FDP is totally missing on ppc64le. I've checked on subscription manager, and on ppc64le is has available only the beta repositories: Repo ID: fast-datapath-beta-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms Repo Name: Fast Datapath Beta for RHEL 8 Power, little endian (RPMs) Repo URL: https://cdn.redhat.com/content/beta/layered/rhel8/ppc64le/fast-datapath/os Enabled: 0 Repo ID: fast-datapath-beta-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-debug-rpms Repo Name: Fast Datapath Beta for RHEL 8 Power, little endian (Debug RPMs) Repo URL: https://cdn.redhat.com/content/beta/layered/rhel8/ppc64le/fast-datapath/debug Enabled: 0 Repo ID: fast-datapath-beta-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-source-rpms Repo Name: Fast Datapath Beta for RHEL 8 Power, little endian (Source RPMs) Repo URL: https://cdn.redhat.com/content/beta/layered/rhel8/ppc64le/fast-datapath/source/SRPMS Enabled: 0 On x86_64, FDP is available and enabled: Repo ID: fast-datapath-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms Repo Name: Fast Datapath for RHEL 8 x86_64 (RPMs) Repo URL: https://cdn.redhat.com/content/dist/layered/rhel8/x86_64/fast-datapath/os Enabled: 1 Thanks. Alright, it seems to be a license related issue. The system have the proper license, but "Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Power" is not enabled on it since the machine isn't the manager. But FDP for ppc64le is available on "Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Power" (SKU RV00099), so I've attached this subscription to the host and was able to start the upgrade process. It's running right now. Installing dependencies: nmstate-plugin-ovsdb noarch 1.0.2-11.el8_4 rhel-8-for-ppc64le-appstream-rpms 22 k nsight-compute-2021.2.1 ppc64le 2021.2.1.2-1 cuda-rhel8-ppc64le 73 M openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy noarch 1.0-28.el8fdp fast-datapath-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 16 k openvswitch2.11 ppc64le 2.11.3-86.el8fdp fast-datapath-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 12 M ovirt-openvswitch noarch 2.11-1.el8ev rhv-4-mgmt-agent-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 8.7 k ovirt-python-openvswitch noarch 2.11-1.el8ev rhv-4-mgmt-agent-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 7.7 k python3-openvswitch2.11 ppc64le 2.11.3-86.el8fdp fast-datapath-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 265 k Installing weak dependencies: network-scripts-openvswitch2.11 ppc64le 2.11.3-86.el8fdp fast-datapath-for-rhel-8-ppc64le-rpms 54 k SKU RH3387200 should have FDP enabled, but it only have FDP Beta enabled. The issue nails down to it. As the end of this writing the upgrade process completed successfully. Hi, is there anything else to follow up on in this bug, or is comment #8 good enough and we can close this? Hi Michal, I can't see comment #8. It seems to be RH Internal. huh, I thought you do...so then the updates that happened some time ago were not really that useful if you haven't seen them:/ The comment is that RH3387200 is not in the list that has FDP, meanwhile RV00099 is in. It should be by design. If you want RH3387200 to also contain the FDP channels you'd need o talk to Product Management or whoever you got the subscription from. @mtessun - it looks like misconfiguration to me, but it could be that it's just a wrong SKU (see comment #6) The subscription came from Red Hat Technology Partner channel, it's a NFR subscription. So something should be fixed directly by RH, right? Is there anywhere I can report this? Thank you. @Vincius Which subscription do you use in x86_64? I think both Fast Datapath and Fast Datapath Beta should exist in RH3387200, or neither of them exists in RH3387200. Only including Beta content in a subscription is weird. Let's ask the RHV product marketing manager Gerry Riveros for details. Another way is to file a ticket in Red Hat Salesforce. Abstract the content from comment #16 as this ticket is raised by external customer and they cannot see private reply. After consulted with Business Operations, the conclusion is that neither PID 474 (FDP for Power LE) nor 475 (FDP Beta for Power LE) should be contained in any RHEL SKU including RH3387200. Supporting material: https://access.redhat.com/articles/3538141 The workflow to remove PID 475 (FDP Beta for Power LE) will go through an internal process and would not be tracked here. Hence, closing this bug as not a bug. |