Bug 198877
Summary: | setup.py bdist_rpm fails with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Martinek <honza> |
Component: | python | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | katzj, mads, nshmyrev, tsui.tony |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-01-06 21:23:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jan Martinek
2006-07-14 11:03:28 UTC
This is a known issue. What happens is, depending on the configuration of rpm, optimized files may be generated (it is an option in the rpm macros file). To work around this problem, in the %install section you have to use: python setup.py install --optimize 1 --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT --record=INSTALLED_FILES I am generally using bdist_rpm just to generate the template spec file, since I cannot control a lot of things that are important from within bdist_rpm. If you choose to continue to use bdist_rpm, you could create a file called install.spec containing the above line, and then do: python setup.py bdist_rpm --install-script install.spec This should be filed upstream with the python developers; if you want to do that yourself please use http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=105470&func=add FYI I got this problem on F8 trying to build pyscard-1.6.6 with "./setup.py build bdist_rpm" http://www.aczoom.com/cms/forums/blockhosts/no-rpm-builds hinted me to a workaround that works for me: echo "%_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0" >> ~/.rpmmacros What is the status of this issue? Unresolved disagreement between python and rpm guys? Ok, we tried to blame upstream, but it popped up again in issue 236535, and this time it seems like we will get it fixed ... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 236535 *** |