Bug 198885
Summary: | Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-28 04:01:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 198884 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Chris Weyl
2006-07-14 12:27:57 UTC
Bits snipped. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.76-1.fc5.src.rpm This failed to build for me, due to errors in the %check section. I replaced it with: pushd t rm 01* 02* 09* 11* 50* 54* popd make test and everything built fine. Note that 0.77 is out (actually came out before your submission, I think), and I can't fetch 0.76 from cpan to compare. I don't see anything of issue with this package, but it's probably best if I review the current version. (Unless you're staying away from 0.77 for some reason.) (In reply to comment #2) > Note that 0.77 is out (actually came out before your submission, I think), and I > can't fetch 0.76 from cpan to compare. If you run: $ spectool --gf perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec several times, you should eventually get a redirect to a CPAN mirror that has it, such as http://cpan.mirror.anlx.net/ Updated to 0.77... Fixed the issues in %check; now using the same _with_network_tests scheme as perl-POE-Component-IRC. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.77-1.fc5.src.rpm I did try via spectool to fetch the 0.76 source about ten times but never succeeded in hitting a mirror that had it. Now that this package is updated to 0.77 there are no worries. Anyway, this builds, installs and checks out fine. * source files match upstream: bca2c306d8c63535845b760883a13644 POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.77.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is redundant). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) = 0.77 perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPChunk) perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead_Line) perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP = 0.77-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) perl(POE::Filter::Line) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=76, 5 wallclock secs ( 2.12 cusr + 0.66 csys = 2.78 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! |