Bug 1989786

Summary: Review Request: pop-gtk-theme - Pop GTK Theme
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Carl George 🤠 <carl>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: ngompa13: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: pop-gtk-theme-5.3.3^1.11bcd41-1.fc36 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-13 03:14:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Carl George 🤠 2021-08-04 01:34:03 UTC 
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362281-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362281-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme-5.3.3%5E1.11bcd41-1.fc35.src.rpm

Description:
The Pop theme for GTK.

Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge

Note:
When running fedora-review on this package, there will be an issue about the package name already existing.  This package was previously in the distribution.  Once the package review is approved I will unretire the package.
Comment 1 Carl George 🤠 2021-08-07 03:01:36 UTC 
Updated to the latest upstream version and split the gtk2 and gtk3 into separate packages.

Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02375556-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02375556-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme-5.4.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2021-08-07 13:42:31 UTC 
Review notes:

* Package is named appropriately
* Licensing is correctly noted and license files are installed
* Package dependencies look sane
* No serious errors from rpmlint

PACKAGE APPROVED.
Comment 3 Carl George 🤠 2021-08-10 00:58:45 UTC 
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10260
Comment 4 Carl George 🤠 2021-08-13 03:14:02 UTC 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-218b50b7cc