Bug 1993445
Summary: | NFD Operator - Serviceaccount for nfd-instance degraded | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | jschinta |
Component: | Multi-Arch | Assignee: | jschinta |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Douglas Slavens <dslavens> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 4.9 | CC: | danili |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | s390x | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-07 16:28:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1980363 |
Description
jschinta
2021-08-13 07:04:48 UTC
Setting reviewed-in-sprint as this bug is new and untriaged and therefore unlikely to complete before the end of the current sprint Hi @Carvel, just a mid-sprint note that this story is currently committed for this sprint. Thank you! Hi Carvel, do you think this bug will continued to be looked at in the next sprint? If so, I'd like to add a "reviewed-in-sprint" flag to indicate that we examined the bug this sprint. It is possible. Will set reviewed-in-sprint. Taking this bug as a part of bug triage in the interim. Assigning to Jan and adding reviewed-in-sprint Hi Jan, do you think this bug will continue to be open after this sprint (November 27th)? If so, I'd like to set "reviewed-in-sprint" to indicate that it will be worked on in a future sprint. Hi Dan, i'm planning to start working on this next sprint. Please set the "reviewed-in-sprint" flag. Checking out this bug it seems that it has already been fixed in the latest version of the operator. I can confirm that the issue no longer exists in the latest 4.9 and 4.10 operators. I tested it with: NFD-Operator 4.9.0-202111171831 OCP 4.9.8 and NFD-Operator 4.10.0-202112031620 OCP 4.10.0-0.nightly-s390x-2021-12-02-191354 As it is already fixed i can't say anything to the cause, but i think it was likely fixed by this commit https://github.com/openshift/cluster-nfd-operator/commit/c85f9aeed664f6be9f969b604db279d2d64c033e which reworked how the status is assessed. |