Bug 1997789
| Summary: | no image found in manifest list for architecture arm, variant "v7", OS linux | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Container Images | Reporter: | Paul Whalen <pwhalen> |
| Component: | fedora-container-image | Assignee: | Clement Verna <clems.verna> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 36 | CC: | acui, bbaude, clems.verna, container-sig, debarshir, dornelas, dwalsh, fedoraproject, mheon, patrick, pehunt, rh.container.bot, santiago, tsweeney, vrothber |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | armv7l | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-05-25 19:32:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | ||
|
Description
Paul Whalen
2021-08-25 19:27:21 UTC
The manifest list does have an entry for 32-bit arm:
mheon@Marlborough code/podman (main)$ podman manifest inspect fedora:latest
...
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 429,
"digest": "sha256:4dd27dd95a83817a5e9c305fdf639948838c08f2c1dff0622e720da2aaffc2a5",
"platform": {
"architecture": "armhfp",
"os": "linux"
}
},
...
First thought is that it's architecture is set to "armhfp" instead of "arm" - that strikes me as potentially incorrect. I'll add Valentin to CC, as he's been dealing with quite a lot recently because of the image rework.
Adding '--arch armhfp' works podman pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest --arch armhfp Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest... Getting image source signatures Copying blob 101fd87d5ca1 done Copying config 856b5adac2 done Writing manifest to image destination Storing signatures 856b5adac2a7f327f8d3147c4b407b151e14e863b9a6c6c526c904766aceefa3 `armhfp` is not a "valid" value. The image-spec states that the architecture should only mention values of GOARCH [1]. For Linux, there's only "arm" and "arm64". The variant field should be used to further discriminate the various arm platforms. I suggest Fedora corrects the manifest list. [1] https://golang.org/doc/install/source#environment This was introduced by https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/10249. I ll work on fix I think this should fix it https://github.com/redhat-imaging/imagefactory/pull/449/files The workaround of using '--arch armhfp' now fails. Looking at the manifest- armhfp, armv7hl or any variant of it no longer exists. This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '36'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 36 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed. Fedora Linux 36 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2023-05-16. Fedora Linux 36 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see the version field. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an active release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |