Bug 1997996

Summary:	[RFE] CephFS+NFS HA
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Sebastian Wagner <sewagner>
Component:	Cephadm	Assignee:	Adam King <adking>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Akash Raj <akraj>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.1	CC:	adking, akraj, gjose, gouthamr, jlayton, kdreyer, prprakas, sunnagar, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Rebase
Target Release:	5.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-16.2.8-2.el8cp	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	.HA backed NFS for improved availability of NFS deployments With this release, NFS is backed by HA to improve availability of NFS deployments. You can deploy NFS backed by `haproxy` and `keepalived`. If the placement specifies more hosts, but limits the number of hosts being used with the `count` property, NFS daemons are deployed on other hosts when an NFS host goes offline.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-08-09 17:36:05 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2102272

Description Sebastian Wagner 2021-08-26 09:01:28 UTC

Due to a technical limitation, we cannot have BZs that related to Jira Epics. This RFE duplicates https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHCEPH-345

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2021-08-26 09:01:35 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 2 Sebastian Wagner 2021-09-02 15:42:08 UTC

depends on the agent at this point

Comment 3 Sebastian Wagner 2021-10-29 12:11:27 UTC

This still stabilizes in master and thus didn't made the cut for 5.1. Moving to 5.2

Comment 5 Sebastian Wagner 2022-01-19 16:10:37 UTC

last remaining PR against master is in upstream QA now

Comment 8 Ram Raja 2022-05-09 18:58:36 UTC

*** Bug 2064710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2022-08-09 17:36:05 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage Security, Bug Fix, and Enhancement Update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5997