Bug 199834

Summary:	Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Goode <adam>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Jochen Schmitt <jochen>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-08-01 18:26:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	199833
Bug Blocks:	163779

Description Adam Goode 2006-07-23 02:46:21 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/nip2.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/nip2-7.10.20-1.src.rpm
Description: nip2 is a graphical front end to the VIPS package.
With nip2, rather than directly editing images, you build
relationships between objects in a spreadsheet-like fashion. When you
make a change somewhere, nip2 recalculates the objects affected by
that change. Since it is demand-driven this update is very fast, even
for very, very large images.

Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2006-07-23 20:15:22 UTC

Good:
+ Tar ball match with upstream source.

Bad:
- Can't find vips-devel as BR.

Comment 2 Adam Goode 2006-07-23 22:06:49 UTC

Check out bug #199833 for vips.

Comment 3 Jochen Schmitt 2006-07-24 16:14:35 UTC

Good:
+ rpmlint on source rpm is quite.
+ Local build works fine.
+ rpmlint on binary rpms is quite
+ rpmlint on installed rpm is quite.
+ Application have a desktop entry.
+ Applcation can start without crash.

I may able to aprove your package after vips is aproved and I have done a mock
build.

Comment 4 Adam Goode 2006-07-28 14:04:23 UTC

vips is now in extras and builds successfully on all releases and platforms.

What's left to do for nip2?

Comment 5 Jochen Schmitt 2006-08-01 18:26:15 UTC

OK, I have done a mock build which works fine. So I can APPROVE your package.