Bug 199965
Summary: | rpm -qa --info "any package containing ++ in the name" ex: compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3 fails to return results, however using rpm -qi --info works | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Zachary Buckholz <zach.buckholz> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 16:03:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Zachary Buckholz
2006-07-24 16:50:09 UTC
What makes you expect -qa to behave like -qi? Arguments to -qa are very different than those to -qi. NOTABUG *** Bug 199966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue. |