Bug 200249
| Summary: | Review Request: cvs2svn | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Paul F. Johnson <paul> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | Flags: | petersen:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-07-27 01:47:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Konstantin Ryabitsev
2006-07-26 14:49:13 UTC
Okay... Should this not be Development/Tools rather than Languages? Could you also clarify if the licence for this software is modified BSD or straight BSD please? Hey, Paul: You're right, I missed the Group bit -- will modify accordingly. I guess I could change the license to "Modified BSD", even though the modification is small: * 3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if * any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product includes * software developed by CollabNet (http://www.Collab.Net/)." * Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if * and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear. It's somewhere between the original BSD and current BSD -- the dreaded "advertise clause" is required, but only in documentation, so it's not a big deal. Like I said, the subversion package in core lists the license as "BSD", so I figure it's safe to leave it as just "BSD" for this one as well. Full license text: http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/project_license.html Updated group: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn-1.4.0-0.2.rc1.src.rpm Added Requires: rcs http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/cvs2svn-1.4.0-0.3.rc1.src.rpm Builds without a hitch. rpmlint is happy, mock is happy. The licence does seem correct as BSD. ACCEPTED Wow, this is the fastest package review I've had in my life. :) Thanks, Paul! Please create EPEL branches: Branches: EL-4, EL-5 done |