Bug 2002749
| Summary: | rubygem-httparty-0.21.0 is available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring> |
| Component: | rubygem-httparty | Assignee: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | valtri, vondruch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-httparty-0.21.0-1.fc40 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-01-05 11:41:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Upstream Release Monitoring
2021-09-09 15:40:48 UTC
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-qmys6q9n/rubygem-httparty.spec'] returned 1: b'error: Bad source: ./httparty-0.19.0-spec.tar.gz: No such file or directory\n' Latest upstream release: 0.20.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.18.1-4.fc35 URL: http://rubygems.org/gems/httparty Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4689/ Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-sgcl36nt/rubygem-httparty.spec'] returned 1: b'error: Bad source: ./httparty-0.20.0-spec.tar.gz: No such file or directory\n' Releases retrieved: 0.21.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.21.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.18.1-6.fc37 URL: http://rubygems.org/gems/httparty Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4689/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-httparty Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-w6qvgwfj/rubygem-httparty.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
StdOut:
error: Bad source: ./httparty-0.21.0-spec.tar.gz: No such file or directory
Traceback:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 188, in build
raise BuilderException(
If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues
|