Bug 200425

Summary: C beautifier support for bigloo is missing
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jerry James <loganjerry>
Component: biglooAssignee: Gérard Milmeister <gemi>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: extras-qa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-31 16:16:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch to add C beautifier support none

Description Jerry James 2006-07-27 16:58:48 UTC 
Description of problem:
C beautifier support is not being configured into bigloo, making its output
somewhat harder to read.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bigloo-2.8b-2.fc5

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild -bc bigloo.spec
2. Look at the output of the bigloo configure script
3.
  
Actual results:
C beautifier support is missing

Expected results:
C beautifier support ought to invoke GNU indent

Additional info:
The bigloo configure script is looking for /usr/local/bin/indent, but indent is
in /usr/bin on Fedora Core systems.  I will attach a patch that fixes the
problem.  In addition to the patch, bigloo.spec should be modified to include a
BuildRequires: indent.  A corresponding Requires: indent is not necessary, since
the Scheme code deals with a failure to invoke indent, but it has to be present
at build time or support is not included.
Comment 1 Jerry James 2006-07-27 16:58:49 UTC 
Created attachment 133171 [details]
Patch to add C beautifier support
Comment 2 Gérard Milmeister 2006-07-27 17:32:50 UTC 
Thanks for spotting this. I will fix this in the next release.
I just tried 2.8c-alpha, but the bdb problem bug #200337 persists.