Bug 2004481
Summary: | Bookmarks button for search in monitor-> jobs is missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Stefan Nemeth <snemeth> |
Component: | Remote Execution | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.10.0 | CC: | afeferku, apatel, aruzicka, kgaikwad, lstejska, mhulan |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-03-02 09:38:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stefan Nemeth
2021-09-15 12:33:37 UTC
Recently we added the option to store bookmarks even on this page. But the bookmarks are a bit tricky. It is possible to search in the table with "job_invocation.status = ..." but it only works on this page, while the bookmarks are loaded for hosts. Bookmark stored on this page would be also show on All Hosts page but would not work well there. The main motivation if I recall though is to easily find all failed hosts for a particular job. We're working on easy filtering of that table by clicking on the overview chart, which should hopefully resolve the main issue here. You can see it in the action on recording here https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_remote_execution/pull/727 Stefan, could you please check with the customer whether this would be sufficient to close this bug? In parallel we are improving the bookmarks experience cross the whole app, somewhere it won't be possible to unify the behavior completely, e.g. on pages where the search is frontend only and is not backed by the database. This is probably now a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630294, both should be resolved with the same solution. |