Bug 200511

Summary:	rhythmbox doesnt import folders
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Steve <bugzilla>
Component:	rhythmbox	Assignee:	Monty <cmontgom>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6	CC:	kem
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-11-13 18:11:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve 2006-07-28 10:56:29 UTC

Description of problem:
rhythmbox doesnt load sound-folders with more than about 80-90 folders inside.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhythmbox-0.9.5-2
gstreamer-0.10.9-1
gstreamer-tools-0.10.9-1
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.9-1
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.3-4
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.2-1.lvn5
gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.1-1.fc5.rf

How reproducible:
if importing a folder with more then about 80-90 folders (or subfolders) inside,
rhythmbox wont load them.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. start rhythmbox
2. import a forder with more then about 80-90 folders inside
3. see what you get, or not
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Alex Lancaster 2006-09-07 12:40:16 UTC

This probably this upstream bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341485.  It's a gnome-vfs bug but it
was fixed locally in 0.9.5.  

Yet another reason to upgrade to 0.9.5.

Comment 2 Alex Lancaster 2006-09-07 12:44:35 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> This probably this upstream bug:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341485.  It's a gnome-vfs bug but it
> was fixed locally in 0.9.5.  

Oops, just noticed that this was with 0.9.5.  Sorry for the noise.  I think that
might be fixed in CVS, however.

Comment 3 Steve 2006-10-20 15:28:24 UTC

i think this is not a problem of rhythmbox. this is probably a kernel bug. 
please see:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070

Comment 4 Steve 2006-11-13 18:11:42 UTC

it was a kernel bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211070