Bug 2005162

Summary: Review Request: fest-util - Utility methods used by FEST modules
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Didik Supriadi <didiksupriadi41>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: NotReady
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-10-19 00:45:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 2005167    

Description Didik Supriadi 2021-09-17 00:59:44 UTC
Spec URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/fest-util.spec
SRPM URL: https://didiksupriadi41.fedorapeople.org/fest-util-1.2.5-1.fc34.src.rpm

Description:
This project provides a fluent interface for assertions.

FEST assertions are incredibly easy to write: just type "assertThat" followed
the actual value and a dot, and any Java IDE will show you all the assertions
available for the type of the given object to verify. No more confusion about
the order of the "expected" and "actual" values. Our assertions are very
readable as well: they read very close to plain English, making it easier for
non-technical people to read test code.

Fedora Account System Username: didiksupriadi41

Comment 1 Didik Supriadi 2021-09-17 00:59:46 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75819014

Comment 2 Package Review 2022-09-18 00:45:20 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Package Review 2022-10-19 00:45:19 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.