Bug 2006947
Summary: | e2e-aws-proxy for 4.10 is permafailing with samples operator errors | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Stephen Benjamin <stbenjam> |
Component: | Samples | Assignee: | Gabe Montero <gmontero> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jitendar Singh <jitsingh> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.10 | CC: | adam.kaplan, aos-bugs, dperaza, gmontero, sippy, wking |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.10.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: |
job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy=all
job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.9-e2e-aws-proxy=all
|
|
Last Closed: | 2022-03-10 16:12:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stephen Benjamin
2021-09-22 17:18:25 UTC
yea my https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/394 / bz 2002368 broke proxy I'll take this one fix is pretty straight forward, but I'm also going to want to add e2e-aws-proxy as an option with the sample operator repo to vet the fix UPDATE: my addition of adding e2e-aws-proxy to the sample repos proved interesting in that the rehearsal job passes without my fix to samples I had copied the e2e-aws-proxy job def from openshift/builder So all this makes me wonder if build api team has not been setting up e2e-aws-proxy correctly. I'm going to try to compare the setup for periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy with our PR tests and see if I can find the difference. While the fix is pretty straight forward, I'd still rather vet it with the equivalent run of periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy before it merges. I've copied David (now owner of samples) and Adam (build api team lead) for awareness. I've compared our e2e-aws-proxy job configs with https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/release/master/ci-operator/jobs/openshift/release/openshift-release-master-periodics.yaml and see no relevant diffs. I've asked DPTP help desk in the interim over in #forum-testplatform In the interim, going to move forward with my openshift/release PR, and create some dummy/test PRs in openshift/builder and openshift/cluster-samples-operator separate from my fix PR to cross reference and vet Petr Muller responded .... hopefully can fix our e2e-aws-proxy def I'll inspect the mustgather of the next few periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy runs later today / tommorrow and confirm samples operator is not an issue the key element will be that samples does not bootstrap as removed, which is what was occurring before, but the default managed that lead to a bunch of sig-builds tests failing because the language sample imagestreams those were dependent on did not exist Looking at https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy the job https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy/1442546511056474112 *MIGHT* have our fix here. But rather than sort out the commit levels now, I'll let it finish, inspect, and we'll go from there. Yeah https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy/1442546511056474112 was missing the fix. Waiting for the next invocation And we have green e2e's https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy/1442674651170869248 https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.10-e2e-aws-proxy/1442770312683851776 verification for this will be handled via the verification for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002368 this bug addressed a regression introduced with that in 4.10 only change marking verified Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056 |