Bug 2007648
| Summary: | Updated container images for 5.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Sebastian Wagner <sewagner> |
| Component: | Build | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Manasa <mgowri> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.1 | CC: | gmeno, gsitlani, kdreyer, mgowri, pcuzner, sangadi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.2.7-19.el8cp | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-04 10:57:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2068135 | ||
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. This is a release blocker. *** Bug 1975742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 2023683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** haproxy 2.2 seems to work: https://pulpito.ceph.com/swagner-2021-11-25_15:52:02-orch:cephadm:smoke-roleless-master-distro-default-smithi/ I've opened https://github.com/red-hat-storage/cephci/issues/1002 to make sure we can override the haproxy image in cephci until we ship. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (New container image for Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1177 The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days |
For 5.1, we will need to add a few container images and I'd like to take this opportunity to streamline things a tiny bit. For 5.0, we have our base image and our own grafana image registry.redhat.io/rhceph/rhceph-5-rhel8:latest registry.redhat.io/rhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8:latest and some external monitoring images: registry.redhat.io/openshift4/ose-prometheus:v4.6 registry.redhat.io/openshift4/ose-prometheus-node-exporter:v4.6 registry.redhat.io/openshift4/ose-prometheus-alertmanager:v4.6 Does it make sense to keep those monitoring containers or is there a potential for an alignment with OCS? With cephadm, there is a possibility to also align on the entry point of those containers. For 5.1, we will need two new downstream equivalents for upstream containers: docker.io/library/haproxy:2.3 docker.io/arcts/keepalived prometheus-weebhook-snmp As far as I can see, we already have those containers downstream already, but we'll need to become official stake holders of those container images in order to continue to get (security) updates.