Bug 2007687
| Summary: | [GSS]ESXi hosts regularly losing the iSCSI connections and not able to recover (5.0z1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Ilya Dryomov <idryomov> |
| Component: | iSCSI | Assignee: | Xiubo Li <xiubli> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Gopi <gpatta> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Mary Frances Hull <mhull> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 3.3 | CC: | agunn, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gjose, gpatta, gsitlani, idryomov, kjosy, mhull, pdhange, pnataraj, tserlin, vereddy, xiubli |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.0z1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | tcmu-runner-1.5.4-2.el8cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.The RADOS Block Device handler correctly parses configuration strings
Previously, the RADOS Block Device (RBD) handler used the `strtok()` function while parsing configuration strings, which is not thread-safe. This caused incorrect parsing of the configuration string of image names when creating or reopening an image. This resulted in the image failing to open. With this release, the RBD handler uses the thread-safe `strtok_r()` function, allowing for the correct parsing of configuration strings.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 2003221 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2021-11-02 16:39:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1959686 | ||
|
Comment 8
Preethi
2021-10-04 12:37:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4105 |