Bug 2008446
Summary: | "Failed to find suitable interface for saving DNS name servers" when configuring an unrelated interface | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | siva kanakala <skanakal> |
Component: | nmstate | Assignee: | Gris Ge <fge> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mingyu Shi <mshi> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.3 | CC: | ellorent, ferferna, fge, jiji, jishi, josearod, manrodri, network-qe, phoracek, till, tonyg |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-07 14:00:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Comment 5
Fernando F. Mancera
2021-09-29 09:21:21 UTC
(In reply to Fernando F. Mancera from comment #5) > As reported on the bug cloned, this was happening because the user > configuration was wrong. A strange profile was added to the node and > therefore the configuration was not correct. They are investigating where > this profile came from but it is not coming from Nmstate. > > If this is happening again or some action is required, please open it again. > > Thanks, > Fernando. Please, refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939557 This bug is going to be re-assign to the right component. Petr, could you do that? Thanks! Hi Siva, To support static DNS in nmstate, you need neither: 1. Interface with static IP and static default gateway(route). 2. Interface with DHCP/Autoconf enabled with `auto-dns: False`. In your example, you are missing the default gateway. Please try to include a route something like: ``` routes: config: - destination: 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop-address: 10.28.16.1 next-hop-interface: ens1f0 ``` *** Bug 2017623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |