Bug 2010704

Summary:	Branch rubygem-asciidoctor and build for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Component:	rubygem-asciidoctor	Assignee:	Dan Allen <dan.j.allen>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	carl, dan.j.allen, davide, daxelrod, fedora, gary.buhrmaster, hany, ktdreyer, mjg, pasik, tdawson, tmz
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rubygem-asciidoctor-2.0.15-3.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-01-23 00:54:38 UTC	Type:	Task
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2041109

Description Neal Gompa 2021-10-05 11:38:47 UTC

Description of problem:
asciidoctor is used by a number of packages for building documentation (like man pages) in Fedora (a notable example being ntpsec). It'd be great if you would be willing to ship rubygem-asciidoctor in EPEL 9 so we can use it in EPEL.

I've done a test build against epel9-next with fedpkg on the rawhide package, and it works fine.

Additional info:
I originally requested this to be added to CRB for CentOS Stream/RHEL 9 in bug 2010397, but the maintainer there asked for it to be maintained in EPEL instead.

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2021-12-14 08:06:33 UTC

EPEL 9 is now available, could you please branch and build it for EPEL 9?

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2022-01-14 14:22:42 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build rubygem-asciidoctor in epel9?
The EPEL Packaging SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 3 Peter Hanecak 2022-01-16 20:51:46 UTC

Blocks: 2041109

Comment 4 Josh Boyer 2022-01-20 13:44:14 UTC

*** Bug 2010397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-01-21 15:38:26 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-662c336890 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-662c336890

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-01-22 01:38:58 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-662c336890 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-662c336890

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-01-23 00:54:38 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-662c336890 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.