Bug 201149 (Cherokee)
Summary: | Review Request: <Cherokee> Flexible WebServer | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Manuel Arostegui Ramirez <manuel> | ||||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | fedora-package-review, jpmahowald, kevin, opensource, s.adam | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2007-06-09 03:56:32 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Manuel Arostegui Ramirez
2006-08-03 08:21:17 UTC
This isn't really going into Core at this point; we have apache for now. Moving to Extras Review. Build failed: checking for bison... no checking for byacc... no configure: error: Bison is required to build Cherokee error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21464 (%build) You will need to add a BuildRequires for this, bison-devel I think. Also, please add a %changelog section to document changes between releases. Delete the gzip line in %prep, the %setup macro handles that. Delete the Autoreqprov: on line, automatic dependencies are already on. If you must manually export CFLAGS use CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" (In reply to comment #2) > Build failed: > > checking for bison... no > checking for byacc... no > configure: error: Bison is required to build Cherokee > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21464 (%build) > > > You will need to add a BuildRequires for this, bison-devel I think. > > Also, please add a %changelog section to document changes between releases. > > Delete the gzip line in %prep, the %setup macro handles that. > > Delete the Autoreqprov: on line, automatic dependencies are already on. > > If you must manually export CFLAGS use CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Done. Bison-devel is not necesary at all, just bison. Thanks John I've corrected two oversight on the spec file, for instance, I forgot ":" after BuildRequires. Created attachment 134280 [details]
New SRPM made after John Patrick told me some errors on my spec file
Created attachment 134281 [details]
New spec file for Cherokee
Comment on attachment 134281 [details] New spec file for Cherokee # Cherokee # 2006 Alvaro Lopez Ortega Name: cherokee Version: 0.5.4 Release: 1 License: GPL BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build Docdir: %{_datadir}/doc Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Summary: Flexible and Fast web server Group: Productivity/Networking/Web/Servers URL: http://www.0x50.org BuildRequires: bison %description Cherokee is a very fast, flexible and easy to configure Web Server. It supports the widespread technologies nowadays: FastCGI, SCGI, PHP, CGI, TLS and SSL encrypted connections, Virtual hosts, Authentication, on the fly encoding, Apache compatible log files, and much more. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ --enable-pthreads make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" %install make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT #rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cherokee/sites-enabled/default %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post /sbin/ldconfig ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd %postun /sbin/ldconfig %files %{_mandir}/* %{_bindir}/* %{_libdir}/* %{_datadir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_includedir}/* %{_sysconfdir}/* /home/httpd/* %changelog (In reply to comment #7) > > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ > --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ > --mandir=%{_mandir} \ > --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ > --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ > --enable-pthreads Any particular reason for not using %configure? Also, here you are not passing --includedir, nevertheless you are using it in %files. > make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" Why this? Above you are exporting CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", here you are overriding it with something compatible again? Typo: s/compatible/incompatible (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > > ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ > > --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ > > --mandir=%{_mandir} \ > > --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ > > --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ > > --enable-pthreads > Any particular reason for not using %configure? > > Also, here you are not passing --includedir, nevertheless you are using it in > %files. > > > make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" > Why this? Above you are exporting CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", here you are > overriding it with something compatible again? > You're right, I've corrected it, here the spec file after those new points of view. Thank you very much, Ralf. %prep %setup -q %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ %configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ --with-wwwroot=/home/httpd/ \ --enable-pthreads #make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" %install make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT #rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/cherokee/sites-enabled/default %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post /sbin/ldconfig ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd %postun /sbin/ldconfig %files %{_mandir}/* %{_bindir}/* %{_libdir}/* %{_datadir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_includedir}/* %{_sysconfdir}/* /home/httpd/* %changelog *2006-08-16 Manuel Arostegui Ramirez <manuel> -Misc changes on spec file in order to make it much more polished. Thanks John and Ralf Which is the most recent spec and/or srpm? As a reviewer I much prefer a full spec or srpm to download either an updated attachment or external URL. Your comment has make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" commented out but the attached srpm does not. If at all possible I don't want to have to apply spec patches before reviewing. Why do you redefine Docdir? If it is a legacy from the existing spec you should be able to remove it. Please make Source0 point to a URL where the tarball can be downloaded. Build fails in %prep at the gzip line: "gzip: %SOURCE.gz: No such file or directory" %setup macro makes the gzip line after it redundant anyway, the setup macro should decompress sources. (At least it does when your source has the Source0 tag.) (In reply to comment #11) > Which is the most recent spec and/or srpm? As a reviewer I much prefer a full > spec or srpm to download either an updated attachment or external URL. The latest spec file is here: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/spec/cherokee.spec And SRPM is also at: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/srpm/cherokee-0.5.4-22.1.src.rpm >Your comment has make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" commented out but the attached srpm does not. You're right. After some talkings with other cherokee developers, we would like to use CFLAGS, because we think that it's a good idea to compile Cherokee with debug info. So I have delete the comment therefore, make CFLAGS is alive again. > If at all possible I don't want to have to apply spec patches before >reviewing. Roger. > > Why do you redefine Docdir? If it is a legacy from the existing spec you should > be able to remove it. Ok I'm going to remove it. > > Please make Source0 point to a URL where the tarball can be downloaded. > Done Thank you very much John. I tought that this ticket would die because of that, I've been working with this spec and no new versions have been uploaded to my server. Hope we can work hard to be successful with this package. The spec file srpm seems to be different than that link. Oh well, I built cherokee-0.5.4-22.1.src.rpm and: - It does not build. Missing flex. - When it does build the configure summary shows it missing tls and openssl. I think those would be useful. To fix these add a BuildRequires: flex openssl-devel gnutls-devel pkgconfig - Your files section is missing a defattr line. - Package owns some standard already existing directories and should not, like /usr/share/doc /usr/share/man. This is a result of the * wildcard %{_datadir}/*. Explicitly list what's under %_datadir. - The cherokee package contains development files like headers and static files, pkgconfig file, aclocal macros, and unversioned .so files. Split these off into a devel subpackage. - Contains .la files. Remove these if possible. - Missing a %changelog section. Please create one and make a new entry and increase the version or release every time you make a spec change. Does it have an init script that could be dropped in /etc/init.d ? (I'm not a reviewer but just helping out) One of the Fedora Extras guidelines and requirements is to run rpmlint on each package - I ran it on your SRPM and it produced: *** output: *** W: cherokee non-standard-group Productivity/Networking/Web/Servers The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". E: cherokee no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. E: cherokee unknown-key GPG#6b9d6523 The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option for more information. E: cherokee no-cleaning-of-buildroot You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". *** end output **** Don't worry about the GPG warning, it's just because it's signed with a key rpmlint doesn't know. I don't think you need to worry about the invalid group, although I would make it one of the 'standard' ones just for the sake of getting rid of the warning. The E:'s you should look into, especially the changelog. Another requirement is to have a changelog entry for each release you push, so that's a good one to have! Even if all it says is something like "initial build", that's OK. As long as there's an entry for each version you make. I just took a look into http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/spec/cherokee.spec and there is a lot that should be fixed. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines %configure already sets these options: --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ So they are not needed here. (see rpm --eval "%configure") %configure also sets CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" So you should set CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" before the invocation of %configure to make sure that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honourd. Do you really need debug level 3 and no optimization? Why are these commands in %post? ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd The COPYING file is missing There is an unneeded Source:, since there is already Source0: Why is there still a Docdir Tag? Why don't you use %{?dist} in the release? The %changelog is still empty. Hey Manuel: Do you still wish to submit this package for review? If so, could you look at addressing the points in comments 13, 14, 15 and uploading a current spec and src.rpm? If I don't hear from you in a week I will go ahead and close this request out. Manuel: I am going to close this now. If you want to continue this submission feel free to re-open this request, or file a new one. |