Bug 2011808

Summary:	RHEL System Roles Automation Hub site should link to downstream/Red Hat links
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Brian Smith <briasmit>
Component:	rhel-system-roles	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	David Jež <djez>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.4	CC:	djez, jharuda, nhosoi, pkettman, spetrosi
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	8.5
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rhel-system-roles-1.11.0-1.el8	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2012342 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-10 14:12:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2012342

Description Brian Smith 2021-10-07 12:31:04 UTC

Description of problem:
The RHEL System Roles Automation Hub Site (https://console.redhat.com/ansible/automation-hub/repo/published/redhat/rhel_system_roles) has upstream links for the "Docs site", "Website", "Issue tracker", and "Repo".  These should instead link to downstream / Red Hat links.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
N/A

Comment 1 Rich Megginson 2021-10-08 16:44:30 UTC

@briasmit

Comment 2 Rich Megginson 2021-10-08 16:46:59 UTC

Docs Site: should we use https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/administration_and_configuration_tasks_using_system_roles_in_rhel ?
Website: not sure what we should use
Issue Tracker: I guess bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%208&component=rhel-system-roles
Repo: not sure what we should use

Comment 3 Brian Smith 2021-10-08 17:30:40 UTC

Agree on the "Docs Site" and "Issue Tracker".  For the "Website" link I think the best one would be our main KCS: https://access.redhat.com/articles/3050101

For the "Repo" link, I'm not sure.  Is a repo linked required?

Comment 4 Rich Megginson 2021-10-08 17:43:39 UTC

(In reply to Brian Smith from comment #3)
> Agree on the "Docs Site" and "Issue Tracker".  For the "Website" link I
> think the best one would be our main KCS:
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/3050101
> 
> For the "Repo" link, I'm not sure.  Is a repo linked required?

I think so, and I think we should use the upstream linux-system-roles.github.io for that.

Comment 6 Rich Megginson 2021-10-20 02:43:54 UTC

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-system-roles/pull-request/44

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 14:12:10 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rhel-system-roles bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1896