Bug 201487
Summary: | g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | irina james <irina.james> | ||||
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 3.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-07 10:25:42 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
irina james
2006-08-06 03:37:25 UTC
Created attachment 133703 [details]
core generated after segmentation fault ; Display
The "The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem." message means GCC driver wasn't able to reproduce the problem, so it means it is not a GCC bug, but rather faulty hardware. Check your memory, CPU temperature, motherboard, ... But in the core generated after the segmentation fault there is the following message: "Core was generated by `/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3/cc1plus -I/usr/local/root/include -I/u'" . Is this linked to a hardware problem? (In reply to comment #2) > The "The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem." > message means GCC driver wasn't able to reproduce the problem, so it means > it is not a GCC bug, but rather faulty hardware. Check your memory, CPU > temperature, motherboard, ... Very likely yes. GCC driver when it detects some internal error, segfault or similar error condition from the backend (cc1plus in this case) will try to compile the same thing 3 times with the exact same options (that has been added to quickly separate real compiler bugs in the bugreports from hardware issues, which are quite common). GCC is a deterministic program, so if it was a bug in GCC, it would crash the same in all 3 cases, but that's not what happened in your case. See e.g. http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ for more info. |