Bug 2017978
| Summary: | [RHOSP18][Deployment][RFE] Switch to show/hide host_status field in server detail response to non-admins | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Artom Lifshitz <alifshit> | |
| Component: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates | Assignee: | Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobreli> | |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Joe H. Rahme <jhakimra> | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | low | |||
| Version: | 18.0 (Zed) | CC: | bdobreli, egallen, jkreger, mariel, mburns, mwitt | |
| Target Milestone: | Alpha | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-17.0.1-0.20221201081418.e675ecb.el9osttrunk | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2024774 2150082 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-04-13 19:10:06 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | Yoga | |
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2150082 | |||
|
Description
Artom Lifshitz
2021-10-27 20:03:32 UTC
To unblock this, please decide on the scoping and needed backports of the dependency bz 1982283 for 16.x and 17? mschuppert: if there is now a request for 17 or 16, we'd have to clone the BZ for those releases mschuppert: but as it is a RFE also do an exception request (for 16.2) Julia can confirm, but targeting this at OSP 18 should be fine. The customer is expected to file a Support Exception to do this manually until OSP 18. I believe that is correct. During the call with the customer where this was discussed, it was explicitly stated that this would end up having to be OSP18 most likely. A recent rhbz email notification reminded me that I opened a rhbz for this a few months ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994072 I'll close that ^ as a duplicate of this rhbz. *** Bug 1994072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982283, moving to NEW in order to determine how we handle custom policy in a NextGen world. Now tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-62 |