Bug 2018

Summary: Failed compilation of the expect-module
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: enrico.scholz
Component: tcltkAssignee: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-04-08 22:21:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description enrico.scholz 1999-04-05 22:49:03 UTC 
I have contacted the developer of the expect module but have
not got any response yet. So I'm trying this way and sending
you a copy of the mail:


------------------------------------

Hi,

compilation of expect fails at a glibc2.1 system with
/dev/ptmx support. There the tests for HAVE_PTMX and
HAVE_OPENPTY will both succeed and "slave_name" declared
twice in pty_termios.c:

-----------------------------------------
gcc -c  -I. -I.
-I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/tcltk-8.0.4/tcl8.0.4/generic
-I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/tcltk-8.0.4/tk8.0.4/generic
-I/usr/X11R6/include -DEXP_VERSION=\"5.28.1\"
-DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/lib/expect5.28\"
-DEXECSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/lib/expect5.28\" -DTCL_DEBUGGER -O2
-mpentium -fno-strength-reduce -march=pentium -g
-DDFLT_STTY="\"sane\""  pty_termios.c
pty_termios.c:173: conflicting types for `slave_name'
pty_termios.c:134: previous declaration of `slave_name'
pty_termios.c: In function `exp_getptymaster':
pty_termios.c:372: incompatible types in assignment
make: *** [pty_termios.o] Error 1
-----------------------------------------
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-04-08 22:21:59 UTC 
I forced expect_cf.h generated by configure to have the values
	...
	/* # undef HAVE_OPENPTY */
	...
	#define HAVE_PTMX 1

which passes "make check".

Fixed in tcltk-8.0.4-29 (which generates expect-5.28-29).

Thanks for the report.