Bug 2018419

Summary: Missing support for image-installer image type on aarch64
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Jiri Kortus <jikortus>
Component: osbuild-composerAssignee: Image Builder team <osbuilders>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0CC: jrusz, obudai
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: osbuild-composer-46-1.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 13:30:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1942219, 1971841    

Description Jiri Kortus 2021-10-29 08:55:17 UTC
Description of problem:
osbuild-composer lacks support for 'image-installer' image type on aarch64. This issue has been already tracked upstream: https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/issues/1903

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
osbuild-composer-33.3-1.el9_b.aarch64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run "composer-cli compose types"

Actual results:
'image-installer' type is missing in the list and can't be built

Expected results:
'image-installer' type is present in the list, it's possible to build images of this type

Additional info:
Adding this BZ for downstream tracking.

Comment 1 Ondřej Budai 2022-03-01 09:55:50 UTC
This was implemented in osbuild-composer 46.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:30:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: osbuild-composer), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2522