Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2019374

Summary:	[RFE] Native Windows RBD driver support for RHCS
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Preethi <pnataraj>
Component:	RBD	Assignee:	Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Manasa <mgowri>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	5.0	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, flucifre, idryomov, kdreyer, mmurthy, vereddy
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	6.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-01-18 15:59:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1980217, 1980218

Description Preethi 2021-11-02 12:46:46 UTC

Description of problem:[RBD] ISCSI - Windows RBD driver feature for RHCS : Deliver a properly MSFT-approved, validated and signed RBD block driver for Windows clients.


More details : https://trello.com/c/pc62iucO/3-windows-rbd-driver

Documentation Requirement: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15_KEsy8LFIG2qeJnUPPspmYMnDtrJiumkwoDdPSc4mg/edit#heading=h.9xf9l7d896t1 [refer usecase- windows signed driver page for attached doc links ]









 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):




How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2021-11-03 07:51:28 UTC

I don't think Bugzilla should be used for such items. It's for RFEs and BZs - this is neither. May I suggest an email on the relevant mailing list?

Comment 3 Preethi 2021-11-08 06:39:25 UTC

@Yaniv- Yes, we are tracking this for feature changes only. Discussions are done via emails and meetings.

Comment 5 Preethi 2022-05-05 03:47:15 UTC

Any update we have on this feature implementation.

Comment 7 Preethi 2022-05-05 09:50:49 UTC

@Ken, Any idea who works on WHQL signing process.

Comment 12 Federico Lucifredi 2022-08-30 20:47:34 UTC

Moving to 6.1 — note that this is our forth (and final) bump.