Bug 2019728
Summary: | German VS-NfD mode broken | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stephan Mueller <smueller> |
Component: | gnupg2 | Assignee: | Jakub Jelen <jjelen> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 35 | CC: | bcl, crypto-team, jjelen, tm |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-13 11:34:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stephan Mueller
2021-11-03 09:03:37 UTC
Thank you for the report. This is the same result I get for the current master version of libgcrypt, which I am working on for the FIPS certification after upstreaming all of our patches so I assume this will be also an issue with the upstream libgcrypt. But looking through the code, it looks like the libgcrypt 1.9.0 and newer was not validated with de-vs so it can not be used in this compliance mode, according to the code comments: https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=blob;f=common/compliance.c;h=33a19fe06be2227239c2c5f4215b9de5889cff9d;hb=refs/heads/master#l590 The libgcrypt source comments confirms this -- no certificate for 1.9.0 version yet so this compliance can not be claimed: https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git;a=blob;f=src/global.c;h=58873372cabccf1fe49feb43b62370483d3b43ac;hb=HEAD#l410 But I agree that the error message should be more descriptive. I filled the following upstream issue: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5726 Given the upstream does not consider this a bug, closing this one too as this is not a compliance mode we would support in Fedora. If you see a space for improvement, please follow-up in the upstream bug. |