Bug 2021615

Summary: Review Request: btrfs-fuse - Read-only, license friendly, FUSE based btrfs implementation
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Davide Cavalca <dcavalca>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: ngompa13: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-10 15:50:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-11-09 18:50:54 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/btrfs-fuse/btrfs-fuse.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/btrfs-fuse/btrfs-fuse-0-1.20211109git28abeab.fc36.src.rpm

Description:
This is a read-only btrfs implementation using FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace).

Although btrfs is already in mainline Linux kernel, there are still use-cases
for such read-only btrfs implementation:
- Educational purpose: let new developers get a quick way to learn how a
  complex and modern filesystem works;
- For certain bootloaders: certain bootloaders need code base compatible with
  their license;
- As a last resort method for subpage/multipage support: currently (v5.16-rc)
  the Linux kernel can only support sectorsize == pagesize , and 4K sectorsize
  with 64K page size; thus this project can act as a last resort method to read
  data from filesystem with unsupported sectorsize.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2021-11-09 19:15:01 UTC
Review notes:

- Packaging follows naming guidelines
- Package licensing is indicated correctly
- Packaging builds and installs
- No serious issues from rpmlint
- Legacy snapshot versioning is used, consider using current snapshot-in-version format

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2021-11-09 19:17:18 UTC
Thanks!

$ fedpkg request-repo btrfs-fuse 2021615
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/37455

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-11-09 19:50:04 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/btrfs-fuse

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 15:46:56 UTC
FEDORA-2021-000584c597 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-000584c597

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 15:50:21 UTC
FEDORA-2021-000584c597 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 23:53:38 UTC
FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75005988c0

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-11-11 04:38:10 UTC
FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75005988c0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-11-13 01:07:01 UTC
FEDORA-2021-80604eca1c has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.