Bug 2021615

Summary:	Review Request: btrfs-fuse - Read-only, license friendly, FUSE based btrfs implementation
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	ngompa13, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	ngompa13: fedora-review+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-11-10 15:50:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-11-09 18:50:54 UTC

Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/btrfs-fuse/btrfs-fuse.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/btrfs-fuse/btrfs-fuse-0-1.20211109git28abeab.fc36.src.rpm

Description:
This is a read-only btrfs implementation using FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace).

Although btrfs is already in mainline Linux kernel, there are still use-cases
for such read-only btrfs implementation:
- Educational purpose: let new developers get a quick way to learn how a
  complex and modern filesystem works;
- For certain bootloaders: certain bootloaders need code base compatible with
  their license;
- As a last resort method for subpage/multipage support: currently (v5.16-rc)
  the Linux kernel can only support sectorsize == pagesize , and 4K sectorsize
  with 64K page size; thus this project can act as a last resort method to read
  data from filesystem with unsupported sectorsize.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2021-11-09 19:15:01 UTC

Review notes:

- Packaging follows naming guidelines
- Package licensing is indicated correctly
- Packaging builds and installs
- No serious issues from rpmlint
- Legacy snapshot versioning is used, consider using current snapshot-in-version format

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2021-11-09 19:17:18 UTC

Thanks!

$ fedpkg request-repo btrfs-fuse 2021615
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/37455

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-11-09 19:50:04 UTC

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/btrfs-fuse

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 15:46:56 UTC

FEDORA-2021-000584c597 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-000584c597

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 15:50:21 UTC

FEDORA-2021-000584c597 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-11-10 23:53:38 UTC

FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75005988c0

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-11-11 04:38:10 UTC

FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-75005988c0 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-75005988c0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-11-13 01:07:01 UTC

FEDORA-2021-80604eca1c has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.