Bug 2021628

Summary: Rebase libtpms to at least 0.9.0 for rhel-9.0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau>
Component: libtpmsAssignee: Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Qinghua Cheng <qcheng>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9.0CC: abologna, coli, jferlan, jsuchane, kkiwi, marcandre.lureau, qcheng, virt-bugs, virt-maint, xuzhang, yanqzhan
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: FutureFeature, Rebase, Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libtpms-0.9.0-0.20211004gitdc4e3f6313.el9 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2021580
: 2027951 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 13:00:41 UTC Type: Feature Request
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1990152, 1990153, 2021580, 2029612    

Description Marc-Andre Lureau 2021-11-09 19:20:11 UTC
Rebase libtpms to at least 0.9.0

This is necessary to pick-up the necessary changes to disable TPM 1.2 support (bug 1990152)

Comment 8 Qinghua Cheng 2021-11-22 06:19:17 UTC
Verified on rhel 9

kernel: 5.14.0-15.el9.x86_64
qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-6.1.0-6.el9.x86_64
swtpm-0.7.0-1.20211109gitb79fd91.el9.x86_64
libtpms-0.9.0-0.20211004gitdc4e3f6313.el9.x86_64
edk2: edk2-ovmf-20210527gite1999b264f1f-7.el9.noarch

Regression test with Win10, Win2019, Win11, Win2022

No regression bug found.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:00:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: libtpms), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2022:2435