Bug 2023429

Summary:	Review Request: vaapi-tegra-driver - Tegra VAAPI backend
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, pbrobinson, pemensik
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-07-04 06:31:07 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	245418, 2218117

Description Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2021-11-15 17:01:04 UTC

Spec URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/vaapi-tegra-driver.spec
SRPM URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/vaapi-tegra-driver-0-0.620211020git49a56d3.fc35.src.rpm
Description: Tegra VAAPI backend
Fedora Account System Username: kwizart

This package is only relevant on Nvidia Tegra architectures (armv7hl and aarch64)
So far, upstream only has tested tegra196 and tegra184 but tegra210 should works (with some dts patches I'm working on).

Build succeeded on copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kwizart/tegra-nouveau/build/2961335/

This requires a very recent kernel. (it should have been 5.16-rc1, but it seems the PR was delayed, so it could be a later rc or 5.17).

Comment 1 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2022-03-15 17:23:00 UTC

Correction, this package is only relevant on aarch64. armv7hl SOC doesn't have the same HW layout.
(I wonder if running armv7 userspace on jetson is possible like done in the rpi cases). 

Anyway, I will assume aarch64 here.

Comment 2 Petr Menšík 2023-01-18 21:16:24 UTC

It seems upstream has not made a change for a year. Is this still wanted to be reviewed? Since we have more recent kernels in F37+, it should be easy to test. Is it still useful for users?

Comment 3 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2023-01-24 10:33:44 UTC

Thanks for looking into this. I'm afraid that this component is not ready. As such it only allows to decode h264 which might be encumbered (fedora has disabled mesa-va-drivers recently).
Also I'm not sure if this ever worked with Wayland (might be) but I only have a Jetson-TX1 to test and unfortunately this doesn't yet work as it. Even with custom device-tree patches the device experiences hardlocks (might work with newer Tegra devices).

So I'm going to import it in RPM Fusion free for now and leave this bug open but with NotReady...

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2023-06-28 09:18:07 UTC

I would actually close this, in it's current state I'm not sure this makes sense.

Comment 5 Package Review 2024-06-28 00:45:23 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 6 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2024-07-04 06:31:07 UTC

Closing as this component is not ready and still needs work upstream for general usage.