Bug 2024775

Summary: ensure zone exists and can be used in subsequent operations
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Component: rhel-system-rolesAssignee: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jakub Haruda <jharuda>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9.0CC: briasmit, jharuda, nhosoi, pkettman, ptoal, spetrosi, vpunj
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: 9.0Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: role:firewall
Fixed In Version: rhel-system-roles-1.13.0-1.el9 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2042541 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 13:03:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rich Megginson 2021-11-18 23:54:18 UTC
Description of problem:

When adding a zone in a list of other operations, you cannot use the newly added zone until the firewall config is reloaded.  The problem is that the role takes a list of firewall settings:

firewall:
  - zone: my_new_zone
    state: present
  - port: 54321
    zone: my_new_zone
    state: enabled

If you are using something like satellite, you do not have access to the playbook, so you cannot insert a task to reload between creating the zone and using the zone.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:

When adding or removing a zone, the operation should take effect immediately, so that the zone can be used in subsequent operations in the list (or not if the zone was removed).


Additional info:

Comment 1 Brian Smith 2021-11-19 13:20:05 UTC
@rmeggins Do we have a corresponding BZ for RHEL 8?

Comment 2 Rich Megginson 2021-11-19 15:56:54 UTC
(In reply to Brian Smith from comment #1)
> @rmeggins Do we have a corresponding BZ for RHEL 8?

No, not yet.  Let's have all of the discussion and whatnot here, then I will clone it, then the clone will have all of the discussion and etc.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:03:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: rhel-system-roles), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2443