Bug 2026003
| Summary: | No seamless upgrade between v4.8.z to v4.9.z though OLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Oren Cohen <ocohen> |
| Component: | Performance Addon Operator | Assignee: | Martin Sivák <msivak> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Gowrishankar Rajaiyan <grajaiya> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.9 | CC: | aos-bugs, shajmakh, ykashtan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-11-24 09:10:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Oren Cohen
2021-11-23 15:48:58 UTC
> The solution will be to publish also the previous channel of PAO (in this example, 4.8)
PAO uses very broad skipRange - basically <4.8.0; 4.9.z), not upgrade edges. So OLM should simply ignore everything and upgrade to the latest version. We intentionally do not publish old CSVs due to this.
Moreover, if OLM restart fixes this, it is an OLM bug, don't you think? There are no new data for OLM and yet it starts working.
well, dunno who's bug it is but the fact remains - there's no (easy) seamless way to upgrade PAO. that should be addressed. In this case, we observed that once you upgrade your cluster to 4.9, OLM have no info on PAO, because PAO does not publish the 4.8 channel in 4.9. It seems that other operators are doing that. Probably this was caused by the following OLM bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002276 The OCP cluster I used when upgrading PAO to 4.9.1 was 4.9.4, in which the OLM bug still existed. I'll close this BZ, thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2002276 *** |