Bug 2026372
| Summary: | container-selinux version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Julie Pichon <jpichon> |
| Component: | container-tools-2.0-module | Assignee: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | atomic-bugs <atomic-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.2 | CC: | dornelas, dwalsh, jnovy, jpretori, tsweeney |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-12-03 21:28:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Julie Pichon
2021-11-24 13:53:21 UTC
I know of know plans to back port, but if so, yes we could coordinate and remove our label of /var/log/containers. Currently we have no plans to update container-selinux in 2.0-8.4.0. If I read the bugreport right - the label of /var/log/containers needs to be removed from 3.0-8.4.0? Thank you for the replies! The new label is fine from container-tools:3.0 onward, there is no need to remove/revert it because we've already patched OSP 16.2+ to expect it now. This bug is only about the container-selinux version in the container-tools:2.0 stream which OSP 16.1 uses. I think this is only if we were to ship an update. Yes, I think the issue is set for now, but we have to be careful about updating selinux in container-tools:2.0 going forward. We have no plans to do so, my fear is a CVE will come in 6 months from now and we will have forgotten this dependency. I'm going to make a note to myself, Jindrich and Dan if you could do the same, hopefully, one of us will remember if the need arises. Given that, Jesse, can we close this issue? From my perspective, I'm happy for the issue to be closed. I wanted to raise awareness, as long as we can get some heads-up for container-tools:2.0 updates this should be fine. Thank you. |