Bug 2026722
Summary: | IP configuration is lost in Windows machines after upgrading the virtio-win drivers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Juan Orti <jortialc> |
Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe> |
virtio-win sub component: | distribution | QA Contact: | Wenkang Ji <wji> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | coli, germano, gveitmic, jinzhao, juzhang, leidwang, mdean, phou, qizhu, vrozenfe, wji, ymankad |
Version: | 9.2 | Keywords: | Reopened, RFE, Triaged |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Windows | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-11-07 08:29:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Juan Orti
2021-11-25 15:39:59 UTC
Hi Vadim, I found two related bugs.The current solution is to warn users when they want to remove or upgrade the driver. But currently bz2005220 has not been fixed.So we can not recive any warning now. So is this bug a duplicate of 2005220? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965552 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005220 (In reply to leidwang from comment #1) > Hi Vadim, > > I found two related bugs.The current solution is to warn users when they > want to remove or upgrade the driver. > But currently bz2005220 has not been fixed.So we can not recive any warning > now. > So is this bug a duplicate of 2005220? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965552 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005220 Well, technically the problem with warning the user needed to be split into two different parts : - .msi (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965552) - FIXED - and the bundler (.exe) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005220 - this problem is a way more complicated than .msi and is not fixed yet. All the best, Vadim. According to comment2,close this bz as duplicate of bz2005220. Please reopen it if I misunderstood something. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2005220 *** The bug reproducer is the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005220, so I set qa_ack to +. Thanks! Hi Vadim, Do we have any progress for this bug? It's ITR is 9.3.0~ Thanks~ Peixiu (In reply to Peixiu Hou from comment #22) > Hi Vadim, > > Do we have any progress for this bug? It's ITR is 9.3.0~ > > Thanks~ > Peixiu Hi Peixiu, It is an installer related issue. I'm going to start working on it after virtio-win drivers code freeze. Best, Vadim. (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #23) > (In reply to Peixiu Hou from comment #22) > > Hi Vadim, > > > > Do we have any progress for this bug? It's ITR is 9.3.0~ > > > > Thanks~ > > Peixiu > > Hi Peixiu, > It is an installer related issue. I'm going to start working on it > after virtio-win drivers code freeze. > ok, thanks~ > Best, > Vadim. the static ip backup/restoring functionally has been implemented. If other settings like DHCP, DNS, WINS or even storage related settings need to be preserved and restored during the virtio-win drivers update, then please open a new bug/jira issue with the exact list of parameters. Best, Vadim. Hi Germano and Juan, We suppose that keeping IP configurations would be sufficient to fix this bz, would you please help check the above comment 29 and confirm if there is other requirement from customer side? Thanks. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (virtio-win bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6388 |