Bug 2027462
Summary: | [virt-manager] Can't open/edit vm details when VM has attached hostdev mdev | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | smitterl |
Component: | virt-manager | Assignee: | Virtualization Maintenance <virt-maint> |
virt-manager sub component: | GUI | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | urgent | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | hongzliu, jjongsma, juzhou, thuth, tyan, tzheng, virt-bugs, virt-maint, virt-qe-z |
Version: | 9.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 2026987 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2021-12-09 20:41:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1995131 |
Description
smitterl
2021-11-29 17:47:56 UTC
Are you sure that you were able to reproduce this on rhel9? I believe the bug is only exhibited when using an older version of the python gobject bindings. I think that rhel 9 has new enough bindings so that the issue doesn't occur on rhel9. Personally, I was not able to reproduce it on rhel9. This bug cannot reproduce on rhel9 with libvirt-7.10.0-1.el9.x86_64 qemu-kvm-6.1.0-8.el9.x86_64 virt-manager-3.2.0-11.el9.noarch kernel-5.14.0-7.el9.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Prepare a VM 2. Open VM details and check the virtual device detail 3. Click VirtIO expected result: show the detail of VirtIO actual result: show the detail of VirtIO 4. use virt-manager to created a VM, customize a virtual disk before install. expected result: virtual disk can be customized successfully actual result: virtual disk can be customized successfully This problem only can be reproduced on RHEL8.6, I think this not architecture-specific because I can reproduce this on x86_64. Closing this due to comment #2. I believe the bug doesn't exist with the packages that are in rhel9. Please re-open if you actually can reproduce on rhel9. I don't remember, sorry for any churn this might have caused. |