Bug 202771

Summary: CVE-2006-4144 ImageMagick ReadSGIImage() integer overflow
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component: ImageMagickAssignee: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: source=fulldisclosure,impact=moderate,public=20060814,reported=20060814
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0633 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-24 11:49:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Demo Image from the reporter none

Description Josh Bressers 2006-08-16 13:15:27 UTC 
An integer overflow bug was posted to full-disclosure describing an integer
overflow bug in the way ImageMagick parses SGI image files.

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/443208/100/0/threaded
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2006-08-16 13:17:18 UTC 
Created attachment 134304 [details]
Demo Image from the reporter
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2006-08-16 13:18:38 UTC 
The patch for this issue can be extraced from subversion:
svn diff -r 3812:3813 https://subversion.imagemagick.org/subversion/
Comment 3 Josh Bressers 2006-08-16 13:19:40 UTC 
This issue also affects RHEL2.1 and RHEL3
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2006-08-16 16:38:38 UTC 
Ok, I added another testcase with the demo image, and did 
5.3.8-16
5.5.6-20
6.0.7.1-16
Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-08-24 11:49:59 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0633.html