Bug 202876 (perl-Data-Alias)
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Data-Alias - Comprehensive set of aliasing operations | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | iarnell |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Alias/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-18 07:50:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Chris Weyl
2006-08-16 21:15:45 UTC
You should be careful with that method of requires filtering, because there's no guarantee that __perl_provides will always be /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov. The safest method is detailed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. That said, many modules do use it and it is relatively simple. Other than that there's not much to say. * source files match upstream: 390fc2fefbf3fa9bf30d482a46989953 Data-Alias-1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Alias.so()(64bit) perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0 perl-Data-Alias = 1.0-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=26, Tests=561, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.78 cusr + 0.25 csys = 1.03 CPU) The skipped test checks for the //= operator and won't run otherwise; I think that's a Perl6 thing. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Data-Alias New Branches: el6 Owners: iarnell tremble InitialCC: perl-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). I'd like to re-review this package, because it was already orphaned. Now upstream live again and they provided new version compatible with 5.12.x Perl and higher. I believe work on it in same ticket make sense, but I can not change reporter, which should be me. SPEC: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Alias.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Data-Alias-1.12-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Aliasing is the phenomenon where two different expressions actually refer to the same thing. Modifying one will modify the other, and if you take a reference to both, the two values are the same. Generally it makes far more sense to simply open your own review ticket. You can close this one as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 697411 *** |