Bug 2029932
| Summary: | CatalogSource name requirement for disconnected deployment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Daniel Horák <dahorak> |
| Component: | documentation | Assignee: | Olive Lakra <olakra> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Petr Balogh <pbalogh> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.9 | CC: | bkunal, branto, ebenahar, kbg, mmuench, muagarwa, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, olakra, pbalogh, rcyriac, yprokule |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | ODF 4.9.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-01-07 17:46:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Daniel Horák
2021-12-07 15:32:40 UTC
Boris, can you or someone from the build team help the documentation team for this issue? All the necessary information should be provided in the linked email thread and the OCP documentation. All info should be in this gchat thread: https://chat.google.com/room/AAAAREGEba8/cKUHznKGO_8 Room: OCS Virtual Teams (invite only) We have two options here: 1) Limit user to use only this redhat-operators catalog source . 2) Be more verbose and provide the description about config map how to allow different name using catalog source. Second approach will require to mention: https://github.com/red-hat-storage/odf-operator/blob/main/docs/customizing-subscriptions.md#customize-odf-operator-via-editing-configmap And describe to use: OCS_SUBSCRIPTION_CATALOGSOURCE NOOBAA_SUBSCRIPTION_CATALOGSOURCE IBM_SUBSCRIPTION_CATALOGSOURCE Saying that those has to be set to the new name of catalog source. As quick fix for this GA I am fine with first option as well. For the other approach we can maybe have article how to do that. @bkunal , WDYT? Also as the second approach was not tested by QE I prefer to stick with 1st one anyway. Looks OK to me. Marking as verified. Looks good to me too. |