Bug 2031179

Summary:	Please build pcsc-cyberjack for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	pcsc-cyberjack	Assignee:	Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	pcfe, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP15-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-01-15 01:50:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2021-12-10 17:33:34 UTC

Description of problem:
Please build pcsc-cyberjack for EPEL 9.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP14-3.fc35

Actual results:
No pcsc-cyberjack in EPEL 9.

Expected results:
pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP14-3.el9 - or better ;-)

Additional info:
Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on EPEL 9 branch. As I effectively did the last two package updates, I wonder if you could add me (FAS: robert) as a co-maintainer for the package, or at least for the EPEL part?

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2021-12-18 22:12:05 UTC

Patrick, ping?

Comment 2 Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2022-01-06 10:37:04 UTC

IMO you fully deserve to be the main maintainer and me on co or even removed completely.
You did all the work.

Let me poke at FAS.

Leaving needinfo on me until I gave you the needed rights in FAS

Comment 3 Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2022-01-06 11:57:48 UTC

Robert, please try now. Changed in FAS a few moments ago.
it's sufficient to clear the needinfo if all works OK.

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2022-01-06 16:52:54 UTC

I don't need to be the main maintainer, co-maintainer is suitable. The permissions worked - thank you.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-01-06 16:57:49 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fe8609eefb has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fe8609eefb

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-01-07 01:44:50 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fe8609eefb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fe8609eefb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-01-15 01:50:35 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fe8609eefb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.