Bug 2031705
| Summary: | [GSS] OBC is not visible by admin of a Project on Console | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Priya Pandey <prpandey> | |
| Component: | Multi-Cloud Object Gateway | Assignee: | Alexander Indenbaum <aindenba> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Mugdha Soni <musoni> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 4.8 | CC: | ableisch, aindenba, aos-bugs, asagare, badhikar, dzaken, ebenahar, etamir, kdoberst, muagarwa, musoni, nbecker, nthomas, ocs-bugs, odf-bz-bot, skatiyar, tdesala | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | prpandey:
needinfo+
|
|
| Target Release: | ODF 4.10.0 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.10.0-128 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
The authenticated user in the UI does not have permission to read NooBaa and BucketClass resources
Consequence:
ODF UI can not list OBC
Fix:
Added a role/service account noobaa-odf-ui that grants permissions to read NooBaa and BucketClass resources
https://github.com/noobaa/noobaa-operator/pull/827
Result:
The user can bind any user to this role to fix the OBC list issue
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 2039781 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-13 18:50:40 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 2039781 | |||
|
Description
Priya Pandey
2021-12-13 09:58:23 UTC
@prpandey @skatiyar any reason there are cephcluster and storagecluster permissions in the example role? we can provide a role for accessing bucket-classes, but if other non-noobaa permissions are required then I don't think this role should be created by noobaa Hi
**Tested with the following builds :-
OCP :- 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-02-16-171622
ODF :- 4.10.0-156
** Steps performed for validation of the fix :-
(a) Created a user named "tom"and project "test".
(b) Added admin role to this user of the project.
(c) Validated the access of OBC from CLI and Console.
** OBSERVATIONS :-
(a) The role "mcg-operator.v4.10.0-noobaa-odf-ui-dc8bf97cd" was automatically created by noobaa.
(b) After passing the rolebinding.yaml as mentioned below , the OBC section was present under Storage in UI .
[root@localhost mcg-3]# cat RoleBinding.yaml
kind: RoleBinding
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: ui-roles-binding
namespace: openshift-storage
subjects:
- kind: User
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
# Change this to the user who requires to access OBC page
name: tom
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: Role
name: mcg-operator.v4.10.0-noobaa-odf-ui-dc8bf97cd
(c) User was able to create and list OBC in UI under cli as well .
[root@localhost mcg-3]# oc get obc -n test
NAME STORAGE-CLASS PHASE AGE
my-test-bucket openshift-storage.noobaa.io Bound 3m31s
Screenshots of the observations are mentioned here "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pWRjjwGkcgq-8p_tDgwKCGPMIrM7CVp8nA2Xe0sbUSY/edit?usp=sharing".
Moving this bug to verified state .
Thanks
Mugdha
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.10.0 enhancement, security & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1372 Hi @prpandey , @musoni , @skatiyar During Automating this BZ I come across below observation. I have created user using htpasswd method and login into new created user. here I observed that in storage dropdown I am able to see OBC option without giving admin access to user. Is this expected behavior? Hi, I have tested it many times, once more time just now on: OCP: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-152346 ODF: 4.11 (latest) I can only see OBC option after creating a RoleBinding. Not sure why u r seeing it without that. But, assuming that it is present, this should not be an issue IMO. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |