Bug 2032207

Summary: Branch and build ntfs-3g-system-compression in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Component: ntfs-3g-system-compressionAssignee: Neal Gompa <ngompa13>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: carl, davide, daxelrod, fedora, kparal, matt, michel
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ntfs-3g-system-compression-1.0-7.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-12-18 01:35:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2032206    
Bug Blocks: 1914423    

Description Neal Gompa 2021-12-14 08:02:19 UTC
Please branch and build ntfs-3g-system-compression in epel9.

Comment 1 Kamil Páral 2021-12-14 10:30:07 UTC
Neal, I believe it was you who created the epel8 branch in the past, I have no experience with EPEL. Reassigning to you :-)

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2021-12-14 10:35:19 UTC
I don't think so. I'm not a maintainer on this package at all...

Comment 3 Kamil Páral 2021-12-14 10:50:21 UTC
Well, the git history seems to point to you:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ntfs-3g-system-compression/commits/epel8

When I created the package, I only created Fedora branches. I don't really intend to maintain this for EPEL, I don't have time for that. But I'm happy to add you as a co-maintainer, if you wish.

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2021-12-14 10:53:16 UTC
(In reply to Kamil Páral from comment #3)
> Well, the git history seems to point to you:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ntfs-3g-system-compression/commits/epel8
> 

I did the merge to deal with the CVE on ntfs-3g a while back.

> When I created the package, I only created Fedora branches. I don't really
> intend to maintain this for EPEL, I don't have time for that. But I'm happy
> to add you as a co-maintainer, if you wish.

Sure, I'm fine with that too.

Comment 5 Kamil Páral 2021-12-14 11:03:10 UTC
OK, I added you as a co-maintainer. Moving the ticket back to you :-)

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2021-12-14 11:36:21 UTC
Could you please also add the EPEL Packager SIG[1] as a collaborator by adding "@epel-packagers-sig" as collaborator for "epel*" branches?

[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packagers-sig/

Comment 7 Kamil Páral 2021-12-14 15:48:20 UTC
Done.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-12-17 13:00:11 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-12-17 13:00:13 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2021-12-18 01:35:12 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.