Bug 2032207
Summary: | Branch and build ntfs-3g-system-compression in epel9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
Component: | ntfs-3g-system-compression | Assignee: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel9 | CC: | carl, davide, daxelrod, fedora, kparal, matt, michel |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ntfs-3g-system-compression-1.0-7.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-12-18 01:35:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2032206 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1914423 |
Description
Neal Gompa
2021-12-14 08:02:19 UTC
Neal, I believe it was you who created the epel8 branch in the past, I have no experience with EPEL. Reassigning to you :-) I don't think so. I'm not a maintainer on this package at all... Well, the git history seems to point to you: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ntfs-3g-system-compression/commits/epel8 When I created the package, I only created Fedora branches. I don't really intend to maintain this for EPEL, I don't have time for that. But I'm happy to add you as a co-maintainer, if you wish. (In reply to Kamil Páral from comment #3) > Well, the git history seems to point to you: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ntfs-3g-system-compression/commits/epel8 > I did the merge to deal with the CVE on ntfs-3g a while back. > When I created the package, I only created Fedora branches. I don't really > intend to maintain this for EPEL, I don't have time for that. But I'm happy > to add you as a co-maintainer, if you wish. Sure, I'm fine with that too. OK, I added you as a co-maintainer. Moving the ticket back to you :-) Could you please also add the EPEL Packager SIG[1] as a collaborator by adding "@epel-packagers-sig" as collaborator for "epel*" branches? [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packagers-sig/ Done. FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4c2a805f41 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |