Bug 2032546
| Summary: | [RFE:EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for python-tabulate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Pat Riehecky <riehecky> |
| Component: | python-tabulate | Assignee: | Ben Beasley <code> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | code, igor.raits, mhayden, neuro-sig, python-sig, rbean, steve.traylen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-tabulate-0.8.9-3.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-05-11 01:41:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2032550 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2078640 | ||
|
Description
Pat Riehecky
2021-12-14 17:05:54 UTC
If you’d like to see a Fedora package in EPEL that is not yours, follow the EPEL package request steps. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ Especially as recommended, did you send an email to epel-devel? Hello, I believe this bugzilla generally follows the listed process there. The recommendation is to wait for a while before reaching out to epel-devel to give the current maintainer time to review the request and see if they have the time/interest to maintain this in EPEL9. Is there a piece of the process I overlooked? My response because as current maintainer I did exactly branches for epel7 and epel8 but currently no interest in epel9. I would potentially be willing to handle EPEL9 if added as an additional EPEL co-maintainer, and if the dependencies were ready. I wouldn’t want to patch out the pandas tests, though, and right now there’s a significant dependency chain (tabulate → pandas → matplotlib → [pikepdf, pillow-tk, pytest-rerunfailures, pytest-xdist, …]) that isn’t ready yet. I put in a PR that excludes numpy/pandas from EPEL 9 and the tests seem to run fine without the long dependency chain. Some tests are skipped, but not too many. Here's the PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tabulate/pull-request/3 This package is in the azure-cli > python-knack > tabulate dependency chain. I'm happy to help maintain this package if the maintainers find that helpful! My FAS username is mhayden. ⛅ Since the PR has been up for about a week without attracting any comments, I’m using my neuro-sig group membership to move forward with the EPEL9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/44129 I’m happy to help take care of that branch going forward, and as mhayden mentioned, he’s happy to be added as an EPEL co-maintainer too. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-783b893543 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-783b893543 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-783b893543 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-783b893543 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-783b893543 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |