Bug 2033029

Summary: [RFE:EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Pat Riehecky <riehecky>
Component: ansible-collection-ansible-netcommonAssignee: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: davide, infra-sig, maxwell
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2033027    
Bug Blocks: 1914423    

Description Pat Riehecky 2021-12-15 18:15:25 UTC
Description of problem:

Can ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon be branched for EPEL9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current fedora


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Pat Riehecky 2022-01-28 20:06:34 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon in epel9? (macros provided in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033025)

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2022-08-30 12:07:07 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 3 Maxwell G 2022-11-04 22:01:07 UTC
At this time, I'm not interested in branching ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon package for EPEL.

Comment 4 Davide Cavalca 2023-06-08 16:10:46 UTC
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Thanks!

Comment 5 Maxwell G 2023-06-08 17:30:12 UTC
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033027#c5. Once those modules are packaged for python3.11, I'd be happy to branch both collections for EPEL 9.

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-10-19 01:51:01 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-10-20 13:34:23 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.