Bug 2033518
| Summary: | [aws-efs-csi-driver]Should not accept invalid FSType in sc for AWS EFS driver | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Rohit Patil <ropatil> |
| Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Roman Bednář <rbednar> |
| Storage sub component: | Operators | QA Contact: | Rohit Patil <ropatil> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | CC: | aos-bugs, jsafrane, wduan |
| Version: | 4.10 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.10.0 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-03-10 16:34:34 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 3
Wei Duan
2021-12-20 03:56:43 UTC
I think that FSType: "" is OK to show that it's not known / default. For block volume based volumes it's useful to show if it's ext4 or XFS (if Kubernetes knows it), because it may behave differently, but for EFS there is no such choice, it's always NFS. Verified.
Status: PASS
Release Version: 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-01-27-221656
EFS Version: 4.10.0-202201261535
Tests:
1) With fstype: efs: pod running fine.
rohitpatil@ropatil-mac dynamicprovi_done % oc describe pv pvc-952c5342-13e1-48e8-9fa2-6c58c1c8993c -n testefs
Source:
Type: CSI (a Container Storage Interface (CSI) volume source)
Driver: efs.csi.aws.com
FSType: efs
VolumeHandle: fs-041b39066187fbf36::fsap-0011da27dc6d91cc9
2) With nonfstype parameter: pod running fine.
rohitpatil@ropatil-mac dynamicprovi_done % oc describe pv pvc-873afa64-066d-4e9f-8df0-08b1320d1a07 -n testefs
Source:
Type: CSI (a Container Storage Interface (CSI) volume source)
Driver: efs.csi.aws.com
FSType:
VolumeHandle: fs-041b39066187fbf36::fsap-05699bded0750b1cc
3) With any other fstypes parameter: pod/pvc will be in pending state with error message:
rohitpatil@ropatil-mac dynamicprovi_done % oc describe pvc efs-claim -n testefs
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Provisioning 3s (x6 over 34s) efs.csi.aws.com_ip-10-0-79-158_6489a227-f449-47b5-9b31-1e8f0ab81f92 External provisioner is provisioning volume for claim "testefs/efs-claim"
Warning ProvisioningFailed 3s (x6 over 34s) efs.csi.aws.com_ip-10-0-79-158_6489a227-f449-47b5-9b31-1e8f0ab81f92 failed to provision volume with StorageClass "efs-sc": rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = Volume capabilities not supported: invalid fstype: nfs
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056 |