Bug 2034385
| Summary: | Spyder 5 code style and docstring underlining style warnings broken. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Golanv <mullein> |
| Component: | spyder | Assignee: | Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 35 | CC: | nonamedotc |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-12-13 16:08:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Golanv
2021-12-20 19:22:35 UTC
I noticed that these dependencies are not listed in the spyder setup.py on Github, which the Fedora package apparently pulls from (openSUSE manually includes these dependencies in their spec file). Is this something that should be resolved upstream? preferably upstream. would you willing to ask upstream and post a link here? it is also possible that spyder expects one of it's other deps to pull these. Sure. This is done: https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/17174 So, the bug was immediately closed as the python-lsp-server package should take care of the needed dependencies. The Fedora spec file for python3-lsp-server does show the "all" extra requirement for %pyproject_buildrequires, but does not seem to otherwise pull those dependencies when installing the package. Perhaps this is a bug with the python3-lsp-server package in Fedora? Thanks for filing this upstream and yeah, I noticed. I maintain lsp-server as well anyway. I will look. If nothing works, I will just explicitly list in the spec file. Okay, I fixed this in rawhide for python-lsp-server. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=28836126 I will update spyder to 5.2.1 shortly. Since these are major version updates, I will only update on rawhide. This should now be fixed in rawhide. Will you be able to test it? Do you think python3-pydocstyle should be added as a python-lsp-server dependency as well? Spyder can check for docstrings as well, but python3-docstyle is needed. Otherwise, I can confirm the python3-autopep8 and python3-pycodestyle are pulled in with python-lsp-server (and python3-spyder) as expected! Oops. I missed the docstyle. Should be fixed now - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1879260 If this works, we can close this bug report. Yep, I can confirm that this is working in Rawhide. Thanks! Please close. This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '35'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed. Fedora Linux 35 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2022-12-13. Fedora Linux 35 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see the version field. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an active release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |