Bug 2035147

Summary:	Please branch and build libdwarf for EPEL9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	libdwarf	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	davide, jitesh.1337, orion
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libdwarf-0.3.4-1.el9.1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2057217
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 1989755

Description Michel Lind 2021-12-23 04:56:47 UTC

libdwarf is in CRB/PowerTools for RHEL/CentOS 8: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/8-stream/PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/

but it's not in RHEL/CentOS Stream 9: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms?filter=libdwarf

Could this be branched for EPEL 9? I'm happy to co-maintain (FAS: salimma), and also, if you add the epel-packagers-sig group to the ACL as collaborator on epel* branch, the EPEL Packagers SIG can help branch and build this for future EPEL releases.

Thanks!

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2021-12-23 22:55:12 UTC

I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2022-01-06 23:57:13 UTC

(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #1)
> I've added salimma and epel-packagers-sig to the package.

Thanks!

❯ fedpkg request-branch epel9                                
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40577

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2022-01-15 06:01:48 UTC

Debugging a build failure with the latest version from Rawhide. If I can't fix it I might just push the version from F35 first.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:21:19 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 5 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 00:16:06 UTC

fixed the issue, awaiting Rawhide PR to be merged to make sure we don't diverge.

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2022-02-23 01:22:44 UTC

PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdwarf/pull-request/1

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-02-24 00:40:45 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-02-25 00:07:09 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4e1a17e1cc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.