Bug 203532
Summary: | a -devel package should be split out + missing requires | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
Component: | gnome-python2 | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | sundaram |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-11-24 15:59:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-08-22 10:47:30 UTC
It is better now, except that * /usr/include/gnome-python-2.0/ is still unowned. * in pygnomevfs.h, there is an #include <Python.h> So it seems to me that gnome-python2-devel should Requires: python-devel * I get warnings when installing gnome-python2-devel warning: group root- does not exist - using root Maybe there is a typo in %defattr? cvs is currently down so I cannot check. Thanks for looking after the details. I fixed the first two items but I can't reproduce the third, nor can I find a typo in the %defattr lines. I probably just need a second pair of eyes to look at the spec file. Pushing an update to Rawhide immediately, but holding off on an FC6 update until there are more significant changes to the package. gnome-python2-2.16.2-2.fc7 I cannot reproduce the error, so we can consider this issue closed. While looking at the spec I noticed the following issues: * spec file should be named the same than Name: (srpm) * there is no Url: * the buildroot isn't the preferred one, and although some people don't like the -%(%{__id_u} -n), you could at least add the %{release} in it (preferred one, which is not really preferred nowadays is:) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Are the autoconf, automake and libtool BR still needed? * Maybe the obsolete could be versioned, with <= the latest version-release known to be obsoleted. You can close the bug if you like, we're drifting.... Thanks, I applied some of these suggestions to gnome-python2 in Rawhide. |